Jun 9, 2012

VOA Special English News 107




Norwegian climate scientists say the Arctic has been loosing 45,000 square kilometers of ice cover yearly over the past 20 years. They say the thinning polar ice has opened new passages for ships across the north. And they say that could make trade between Europe and Asia 40 percent faster than using the Suez Canal. Norwegian foreign minister Jonas Gahr Stoere recently brought American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the city of Tromso. She visited in the area which could hold 20 percent of the world's undiscovered oil and gas supplies. The United State Geological Survey say they could be worth 9,000,000,000,000 dollars. She said many countries are looking at the possibilities for exploration of the Arctic for its resources.

original news日本語のニュース

(日本語訳)
ノルウェーの気象学者によると北極圏では過去20年にわたって、毎年45,000キロ平方メートルの海氷が失われており、また海氷が薄くなっているため、北極海を通過する新たな航路が開いているとのことである。その航路によって、ヨーロッパとアジアの間の交易が、スエズ運河を使うよりも40パーセント早くなるとのことである。ノルウェーのヨーナス・ガーレ・ストーレ外相は、アメリカのヒラリークリントン国務長官をトロムソの町に連れて行き、彼女は世界の未開発の石油や天然ガスの20%を保有している地域を訪問した。アメリカ地質調査所によるとそれらは90億円の価値があるとのことである。クリントン長官は多くの国々が北極圏の資源開発の機会を伺っていると言った。

My thought/opinion this issue
This is a very interesting news. Some countries might not depend on the Middle East's oil because of the effect of climate change.


2 comments:

ジョン said...

say Arctic has been loosing 45,000 square kilo meters
--> say the Arctic has been losing 45,000 square kilometers

9,000,000,000 dollars
--> $9,000,000,000,000
The scale proceeds like this:
1,000,000 is one million
1,000,000,000 is one billon
1,000,000,000,000 is one trillion
However, the scale is different parts of the world. In the U.S., we use the short scale. The multiple systems are a bit confusing, I think.

looking at possibilities for exploration of Arctic
--> looking at the possibilities for exploration of the Arctic

Yes, it will be interesting to see how the situation develops in the coming years.

bikenglish said...

Jon-san,

Thank you for good information, I have first learned "short scale" and "long scale".

I have known "trillion", but I made a mistake in writing it in this case.